| 
PART 1503--COMMENTING
 
  
 
 
    Authority: NEPA, the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, as
  amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.), sec. 309 of the Clean Air Act, as
amended
  (42 U.S.C. 7609), and E.O. 11514 (Mar. 5, 1970, as amended by E.O. 11991,
May
  24, 1977).
 
    Source: 43 FR 55997, Nov. 29, 1978, unless otherwise noted.
 
 Sec. 1503.1  Inviting comments. 
 
   Sec. 1503.2  Duty to comment.
 
    Federal agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with
respect
  to any environmental impact involved and agencies which are authorized to
  develop and enforce environmental standards shall comment on statements
  within their jurisdiction, expertise, or authority. Agencies shall comment
  within the time period specified for comment in Sec. 1506.10. A Federal
  agency may reply that it has no comment. If a cooperating agency is
satisfied
  that its views are adequately reflected in the environmental impact
  statement, it should reply that it has no comment.
 
   Sec. 1503.3  Specificity of comments.
 
    (a) Comments on an environmental impact statement or on a proposed
action
  shall be as specific as possible and may address either the adequacy of
the
  statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed or both.
    (b) When a commenting agency criticizes a lead agency's predictive
  methodology, the commenting agency should describe the alternative
  methodology which it prefers and why. 
    (c) A cooperating agency shall specify in its comments whether it needs
  additional information to fulfill other applicable environmental reviews
or
  consultation requirements and what information it needs. In particular, it
  shall specify any additional information it needs to comment adequately on
  the draft statement's analysis of significant site-specific effects
  associated with the granting or approving by that cooperating agency of
  necessary Federal permits, licenses, or entitlements. 
    (d) When a cooperating agency with jurisdiction by law objects to or
  expresses reservations about the proposal on grounds of environmental
  impacts, the agency expressing the objection or reservation shall specify
the
  mitigation measures it considers necessary to allow the agency to grant or
  approve applicable permit, license, or related requirements or
concurrences.
 
   Sec. 1503.4  Response to comments.
    (a) An agency preparing a final environmental impact statement shall
assess
  and consider comments both individually and collectively, and shall
respond
  by one or more of the means listed below, stating its response in the
final
  statement. Possible responses are to:
-  Modify alternatives including the proposed action.
  -  Develop and evaluate alternatives not previously given serious
  consideration by the agency.
  -  Supplement, improve, or modify its analyses.
  -  Make factual corrections.
  -  Explain why the comments do not warrant further agency response,
citing
  the sources, authorities, or reasons which support the agency's position
and,
  if appropriate, indicate those circumstances which would trigger agency
  reappraisal or further response.
  
    (b) All substantive comments received on the draft statement (or
summaries
  thereof where the response has been exceptionally voluminous), should be
  attached to the final statement whether or not the comment is thought to
  merit individual discussion by the agency in the text of the statement.
    (c) If changes in response to comments are minor and are confined to the
  responses described in paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) of this section, agencies
  may write them on errata sheets and attach them to the statement instead
of
  rewriting the draft statement. In such cases only the comments, the
  responses, and the changes and not the final statement need be circulated
  (Sec. 1502.19). The entire document with a new cover sheet shall be filed
as
  the final statement (Sec. 1506.9).
 
 
Back to Table of Contents
 |